E2150 - Mining: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(Typos) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
(→LC) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
| Standard || 107 000 |
| Standard || 107 000 |
||
|} |
|} |
||
The data above means that upg mine mines faster by some 8,9%, however in upg mines were just about to consume some containers at this point, and the actual value is closer to ~9, |
The data above means that upg mine mines faster by some 8,9%, however in the test, the upg mines were just about to consume some containers at this point, and the actual value is closer to ~9,5-10%. |
||
It is also worth mentioning, that it doesn't make any difference whether you place mines on the corners, or |
It is also worth mentioning, that it doesn't make any difference whether you place mines on the corners, or grouped, or in any other way - any variant of 4 mines placed on a standard (H, II or X) resource field performs exactly the same. |
||
== UCS == |
== UCS == |